Not to say you are wrong but how do you know it's AI generated rather than written by Sorca Marian? To me phrases like "Models look god-tier on paper" look more human than AI as a) "god-tier" never came up in the interview and b) it's brief and doesn't waffle on.

If it was AI-generated I had no difficulty with it, certainly on par with typical surface level journalist summaries, and vastly better than losing 2 hours of my life to watching some video interviews.. :) AI as we know it may not be real intelligence but it certainly has valid uses

I get a lot from seeing the person talk vs reading a summary. I have gone back and watched a lot of interviews and talks with Ilya. In hindsight, it is easy to hear the future ideas in his words at the time.

That said, I use AI summaries for a lot of stuff that I don't really care about. For me, this topic is important enough to spend two hours of my life on, soaking up every detail.

As for being on par with typical surface level journalism. I think we might be further into the dead internet than most people realize: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Internet_theory

> I get a lot from seeing the person talk vs reading a summary

And some people simply have the opposite preference. There's lots of situations where sound is simply not an option. Some people are hearing impaired. Some people are visually impaired, and will definitely not get much from watching the person speak. Some ESL people have a hard time with spoken English. Even some native English speakers have a hard time with certain accents. Some people only have 5 minutes to spare instead of 50.

All of those problems are solved by the written word, which is why it hasn't gone away yet, even though we have amazing video capabilities.

You can have a preference without randomly label everything you don't like as AI slop.