Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Aboutplants's commentslogin

Tangentially, with ai tools available, post hoc secondary analysis of studies (like this) has to be insanely easier to run through. Are there are companies/individuals focused on this specifically? Obviously most labs are doing some of this but I’m curious if there are broader analysis being done

tbh I'd expect the opposite - inherent bias / regression to the current norm comes through quite consistently when they're used to summarize stuff, and that'll badly taint science using it.

Legitimate question, what would Israel need that we don’t already openly provide?

Protection from the risk that the tide might turn on them despite their extensive political lobbying? Just taking a guess here but probably not far off.

One of the YouTube "CIA former spies" explained it very well (paraphrasing): "we shared the F-35 with them, but we kept about 10% of the technology to ourselves and sold them a variant. That wasn't enough for them, they ran an espionage operation to get the remaining 10%".

Dirt on anyone proposing that we stop openly providing such assistance?

"The designation stems from concerns within the Pentagon that Israel is making a particular effort to surveil top U.S. officials to get information on the Trump administration’s internal deliberations and decision-making on the conflicts in the Middle East, the officials said."

So Israel wants to know what Trump is going to do next.


Don't we all.

Seems like he's the only one that doesn't feel any need to think about this question.

Which, of course, is deliberate. He has weaponized uncertainty to perfection.

If that was true, he wouldn't keep losing negotiations.

Weaponized against us, the American people, not against any of our geopolitical rivals.

Anything that the chief-executives of either government can exploit to keep themselves out of jail.

The vessel state now fully controls its host, but I think public sentiment is reversing it just a little.

I mean, they did just start a war with iran as a joint venture with trump.

I could understand why anyone who starts a joint venture with trump would be nervous about trump selling them out. It is trump after all. Probably is a logical thing to be concerned about.


there's currently disagreements with Israel on their approach to Lebanon being way more aggressively and murderous than "necessary", whatever that means. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5904899-trump-ne...

The well publicized disagreements are just diplomatic cover. The USA can look tough. Israel might back off for a little bit. Everyone looks good for a moment. Reason has prevailed. Then it'll all go back to Israel's criminal "gaza policy" in South Lebanon, continuing the wanton murder of 1000s of civilians under the guise of "they use children as shields". Well yeah, it's endless guerilla warfare and now hezb has drones. Diplomacy is the only way.

You can't really negotiate when one party is a religious fanatical death cult and the other one is Hezbollah.

New blackmail material in case Trump starts to turn on them?

Trump doesn't let Bibi bomb Lebanon and doesn't fight to the last American in Iran

> Trump doesn't let Bibi bomb Lebanon

Sure he does. They did it today!

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj0g8jymg92o


Trump doesn't let?

Trump is sitting in a chair in the corner of the room of any negotiation he's in. He's weak at best.


> sitting in a chair

More like sleeping in the chair


It's in the corner, and it's porcelain. But you get it. And people worship that.

combat is a dynamic situation, if you have no idea what its participants can/cant/will/wont do, you cant formulate prevailing tactics.

situational awareness is best when first hand, as someone may be lying to you, or may not even know what they are doing in the first place.


[flagged]


UPDATED COMMENT: Wikipedia says the 1967 attack on the U.S.S. Liberty was "a mistake due to Israeli confusion about the ship's identity," according to both U.S. and Israeli governments. (Though they also note people who question that conclusion...)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident


Might be an attempt to correct history after the bad fact. There are huge budgets nowadays set up to correct public opinion, e.g. https://www.timesofisrael.com/foreign-ministry-to-receive-ma...

Edit: a more recent article mentions a budget of $730M:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-just-quintupled-its-pr-...


But everyone has such budgets, so you could easily argue there's an attempt to revise history in both directions. And I can assure you the sum of the Chinese, Russian, Iranian and gulf budgets far surpass that of Israel's.

Sorry, the linked article shared above is from 2024. Here's a more recent one with a much larger budget for their state propaganda:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-just-quintupled-its-pr-...

Not sure if Russia, China and the others you mention spend more (totalled) than $730M?


Despite the budget, that is clearly one thing where Israel has fallen behind its adversaries.

Conspiracies are always possible, but also keep in mind that parking a ship in the middle of a war zone is always a bad idea. In modern conflicts, significant casualities come from friendly fire incidents. If armies cant even consistently not accidentally target their own troops, it seems entirely plausible they accidentally hit a neutral ship hanging out in the middle of a war zone.

I think the biggest issue with this conspiracy theory is why Israel would want to take out the liberty? It seems like the events would be strongly detrimental to Israeli interests. Nobody has really come up with a compelling motive, which suggests to me the most likely scenario is accident/miscommunication.


Public wiki's may be subject to alternate reality. [1]

[1] - https://www.youtube.com/shorts/au7GlkiF2O4


Uh-huh. The official story two very trustworthy sources on the matter. The coverup and silencing of the survivors and threats to their persons and families if they attempted to tell their stories are probably just coincidences.

Don’t feed the troll^

First of all 5mg is a standard medical dosage for this medicine and isn’t likely to produce horrible experiences that you would get with much larger doses.

Second, you think it’s more ethical to let a patient suffer? Are you against emergency surgeries where a patient is unconscious after a car accident?


The dose in the paper is 5 grams, not mg

> Second, you think it’s more ethical to let a patient suffer? Are you against emergency surgeries where a patient is unconscious after a car accident?

My concern is that this induces more suffering. They are going to gain lucidity and then lose it again. That must be deeply distressing (for the family/relatives too). Can’t imagine that psychedelics help with the state of psychosis/hallucinations that advanced Alzheimer’s patients already experience too


From the Frontiers paper: "The patient received 5 g of orally administered psilocybin-containing mushrooms (Enigma strain". i.e., a standard dose of 5g of mushroom.

I’m assuming you’ve never taken mushrooms before (on average there is probably ~10mg psilocybin per dried gram, so 5g is 50mg which is on the high end of dosing, definitely not ‘standard’)

We don't know they were dried. We do know the strain is a particularly potent one that grows in a fashion that might not lend itself to normal water concentrations.

Really though, weren't you the one conflating mushroom dosages with those of pure psylocibin a moment ago? I find it difficult to believe someone with more than incidental experience would make that mistake.


> Really though, weren't you the one conflating mushroom dosages with those of pure psylocibin a moment ago?

I think you’ve misunderstood. I was quoting the paper, which states 5 grams. 5 grams is a lot of mushrooms, especially for someone who is not compos mentis. 5g implies probably ~50mg of psilocybin, I haven’t been conflating them at all (you measure the amount of mushrooms because obviously you can’t see how much psilocybin is in each one).

If the paper stated an exact dose of psilocybin this would be a totally different discussion

Edit: I just realised the quote in my first comment incorrectly states 5g psilocybin- I didn’t ever understand the paper as meaning that, I just wrote that incorrectly. All of my subsequent comments were talking about this as 5g mushrooms - which is still a heavy dose!


No worry, cool. Easy to do, sorry to press. It just seemed weirdly aggressive calling the other guy out after that and I felt the need to address it.

Let me clarify. A "medically" standard dose. My personal preference would be 1-3g.

I just got to the bottom of your argumentative thread and I just got to say: "says you".

Mathematicians shouldn’t be allowed to name anything, it’s beyond ridiculous

That's exactly why mathematicians should name things.

I've always considered magnets to be the closest thing we have in real life to magic.

That is just soft firing, those choosing to not return to office will be among the 23%. That has been a normal tactic for years now.

Maybe. But, at my compare all new starters must be in the office 3 days a week.

I’ve wondered how VR could help people with their fear of public speaking as a decent introduction to the experience.

My doctor always says “There are three little things that will give you the best chance at living a long and healthy life. Eat a little better, move around a little bit, and get a little more sleep”

Its even better to have a government pension that sends checks to your address as long as you are alive.

For the statistics though, it's even better if those checks continue after your death.

Eat fewer calories. Consume as little added sugar as possible.

You don't have to eat much better. You can trivially supplement. It's far more important to eat less.


This is basically not true. The particular makeup of the calories you're consuming matters. E.g., it is likely (but not proven) that dietary fiber is causal for reducing rates of common cancers. And also likely that dietary saturated fats cause various kinds of heart and artery disease. Similarly protein is important for muscle mass which is associated with longevity. Additionally, people who are already underweight should not reduce their calorie consumption.

Alas, the easiest advice is the hardest to follow short term but the best to do long term.

Most teams are run as skeleton crews and if I’m a hiring manager I’m ensuring I get senior, experienced employees regardless of where they work. If a company allows remote then my net for quality senior employees is massively increased.

Going to need a response from IAAS

IAAS, but IANYS

I just assume bots

Bots doing what? How would the poster being a bot influence why the post itself makes it to the front page with just 10 points?

It’s about how quickly they get those points. It doesn’t have to be bots. Sending a post to friends with reputable human profiles, and asking for a vote kinda works of most social networks. Some social networks claim they have protection against this but I wouldn’t bet they catch everything.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: