Incoming site: Can It Play Doom?

Coming from a quietfox, it is OK. It is important to preserve oneself ^^.

The debug log was not without its charms. The article was not bad yet not my favorite.

That's not ideal. I'm not a fan of this.

It may have been used, how could we know?

Mainly, I don't get why there are quote marks at all.

> Google kills Gemini Cloud Services (killedbygoogle.com)

by dang_fan

Priceless!

Looks like someone thought it was a good handle <https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dang_fan>

2 cents here. Let's make this article optimistic and forward looking.

That's somehow intriguing to write an article that says "no" without providing "yes" examples. I don't view this as very generous.

Looking for further updates.

the rest of this website section is exactly that:

https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/apg/practices/

and generally:

https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/apg/

This is the "Read Me First" page on a site absolutely full of documentation...

The first Google example is a nice one: You could have only one icon for each group (one trash for all the 'delete' actions', one share icon for all the 'share / download' actions, etc). That would be really helpful, for what it is worth.

Globally, I had a pleasant time reading this article which was way too dedicated to something that is almost invisible in its current state (ie: I don't notice those icons and surely think they aren't _that_ helpful for any type of user unless used in a rare way).

Yes menu item group icons would be a much better anchor: third icon under such and such icon

I hope those are not mutually exclusive actions. Switching and contributing may be on the Schleswig-Holstein Administration's agenda.

Those AI agents are coding fast, or am I missing some obvious concept here?

Not only defense may I add.