Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | MattGaiser's commentslogin

I recall in university that many of these existed but all died as soon as they wanted payment. This seems like airline seat space. People find small seats painful. They find paying anything extra even more painful.

I mean, given that students have for long periods crammed for tests 72 hours before and that the number of course hours is also sparse and inefficient, I am surprised it took this long.

You look at a lot of places and between unions, procurement rules, or an obsession with certain classes of contractors, government capacity is badly hobbled from the start.

Eh, the way the US does a lot of things have significant cost problems.

Public spending on healthcare is around 8-9% of GDP once you add things up.

So you have already paid for a public healthcare system in many ways.


A lot of US states and municipalities work that way. Can argue whether it is wise, but it is certainly common.

Most US states are not global superpowers with hundreds of millions of citizens.

The scale is completely different. Economics do not simply scale up and down, the math changes drastically when the numbers get bigger.


>The scale is completely different.

Yes, the scale is different. This means that the debt problem can go on for far longer without being apparent. It can even be put off until the current slate of politicians are out of office, until they're dead of old age and beyond accountability. Scale can hide things, by making them so big your field of vision doesn't allow you to see it all at once.


A lot of them just plug into a wall outlet.

This cohort has always existed though. Users of Notepad and Vim still exist.

Grouping Notepad and vim together under "tools that make your job harder" is pretty wild.

Has anyone ever known a serious, professional programmer who used Notepad to code?


Next you'll be telling me there's punch card programmers still. For love of the punch card craft.

I see the error is for the website, but that seems to be working?

A lot of that can be overcome by including the need to be able to put more floors on top as part of the spec. Whether it be humans or agents, people rarely specify that one explicitly but treat it as an assumed bit of knowledge.

It goes the other way quite often with people. How often do you see K8s for small projects?


> A lot of that can be overcome by including the need to be able to put more floors on top as part of the spec

I wish it could, but in practice, today's agents just can't do that. About once a week I reach some architectural bifurcation where one path is stable and the other leads to an inevitable total-loss catastrophe from which the codebase will not recover. The agent's success rate (I mostly use Codex with gpt5.4) is about 50-50. No matter what you explain to them, they just make catastrophic mistakes far too often.


In general, there’s very little info that costs much to learn nowadays. The human standing in the front is a disciplinarian to force you to learn it.

Or, more likely, a snake oil seller dedicating more to marketing than to the product.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: