What is that supposed to mean? Some people find it more pleasant to read on a dark background (e.g. because of photophobia), some prefer it for aesthetic reasons (e.g. for a site about space exploration), how is that ‘wrong’?
In LaTeX you also clearly separate structure and typesetting: you don't write \noindent\textbf{Introduction}\nobreak\medskip or whatever, but simply \section{Introduction}
Macros are also pretty easy to define
\newcommand\important[1]{\textcolor{red}{#1}}
"In LaTeX you also clearly separate structure and typesetting ..." Not quite.
The rub comes in when you want to pull that content out to render it in a format that isn't meant to be camera-ready, like a Web page or an e-book. TeX, even with Leslie Lamport's LaTeX macros, doesn't give you an ergonomic mechanism for marshalling out the semantic structure of your document to reuse elsewhere.
You're left parsing the TeX yourself, and that sucks.
The main problem I have with Typst compared with LaTeX is that it doesn't handle basic fine typographic features, such as the different types of spacing in mathematical mode (mathop, mathbin, mathrel, etc.) or the size of delimiters (big, bigg, etc.)
I didn't know about math classes, thank you for the reference
The issue I have with delimiters is that there is no option for "big", but only for "140%" or whatever, making it harder to be consistent
Someone created an issue on this on GitHub if I remember correctly
And automatically chosen sizes are often too large
Ah, yeah fair enough! I was confused thinking that you were unaware of the existence of the functionality as a whole. Well, as laurmaedje (one of the main devs) said below, it should be easy to add, though it seems difficult to find which size values `big`, `bigg` and so on exactly represent.
> GPT-4o (“o” for “omni”) is our most advanced model. It is multimodal (accepting text or image inputs and outputting text), and it has the same high intelligence as GPT-4 Turbo but is much more efficient—it generates text 2x faster and is 50% cheaper. [1]
93/100 here, wonder if there’s a difference between mobile and desktop? I played on mobile and being able to bring my phone right up close to my eyes seemed to make it easier to judge the spacing than if I’d done it at my desk.
Since you're not increasing the number of variables, it seems to me that the problem of finding the initial Boolean formula (or an even simpler version of it) is fairly straightforward. Have you done any tests along these lines?
Yeah, even LLVM is able to decode part of the obfuscated expression. Sometimes, it fails greatly printing out the obfuscated expression. There're several papers available and I'll write about it.
What is that supposed to mean? Some people find it more pleasant to read on a dark background (e.g. because of photophobia), some prefer it for aesthetic reasons (e.g. for a site about space exploration), how is that ‘wrong’?