Why didn't other CEOs buy them to wreck Zuck's platform?

> They are just focused on privacy and are likely waiting for the time when local models become efficient enough to run on iPhones

How does that make any sense?

iPhones may be able to run local model inference, but Apple still can't train anything if they don't have any data.

Nope. It's almost all Oracle Linux.

Nobody watches CNN

My company's GPU cluster

What's the problem? Surely people will fork it

But nVidia already sells servers (NVL72), and CPUs (Grace). Why buy a bunch of overlapping companies?

And no sane regulator on the planet will allow them to takeover AMD, Qualcomm, or Broadcom.

A $1m dinner at Mar-a-Lago will take care of that.

https://www.npr.org/2025/04/09/nx-s1-5356480/nvidia-china-ai...

Lucky for them Americans have recently gone insane.

There are many race tracks in LA area.

Then why did Apple have a $20B a year search deal with Google?

The argument can be made that when people search Google they know they are using Google but when they use Siri they assume that their data is not going to Google. I think this is more likely to be solved contractually than having Gemini running on a datacenter full of M5 Ultra servers.