Without having thought about it for more than about 10 seconds: I guess I associate violence with something more personal: an actual person or living thing, or personal property. I guess "corporate property" is where it gets more into the grey zone for me.
But I see your point. Destroying a thing (even corporate) is a pretty extreme reaction that I can only see making sense after having exhausted all other "peaceable" avenues.
People that see these things as detrimental to society though are likely pretty motivated.
Well Tailwind CSS is a CSS framework, and I'm writing CSS.
What Tailwind does is go fully into inline styles though. But I don't think that's an efficient approach, you also break a few other Clean Code principles along the way.
I do have some classes I sometimes apply inline, which are defined in the util.css, but the majority of styling is not done this way.
I built myself a SSG for React based on Vite as a build plugin. It is very simple, fits in one file, and the dev experience is almost exactly like having React Router but with SSG built in. Once a user configures the build plugin there's nothing left to worry about besides building a classic React website.
It absolutely cracks me up that this could've been easily avoided by choosing a unique name. Seems it is impossible for us to name a software after anything but an already-taken word! I am certainly guilty ha
I wonder how many centuries it will take before humans widely understand second-order effects. Mark my words, like the GDPR before it this will make the web worse for everyone.