Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jovas's commentslogin

I like some variant of STIX (I never know the exact difference) and Gillius Sans


stickstootext


Venus has a retrograde day that is longer than it's year.

While the atmosphere is a big problem, even without this issue the rotation would be problematic.


If the commenters are discussing diverting enough meteors to terraform Venus, there's enough fantasy to consider using nukes to apply the necessary torque to speed the orbit up


If we're spitballing, one could simply angle the impacts of asteroids to add momentum in the desired direction.


With that much atmosphere that’s a lot of tidal forces too, if you just get some I to orbit.

But the question. Is do you spin it backward or slow it down to spin it the right way, creating a situation where one side of the planet always faces the sun for a while. Might be an opportunity to freeze and cart off the other side of the atmosphere…


Why don't we simply vaporize Venus entirely and construct our own bespoke planet in its place, if it's so damn problematic

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Technobabble


I don't know.... It tells me that by car I can get someplace (that's geography close!) in < 15 min, but it's always taken me 20...


Mentions pretty clearly it doesn't include traffic data since that's all proprietary vendors


It upsets me that the only widely available versions of Amadeus now is the "extended edition," which fundamentally alters the film’s core message.

In the original theatrical cut, Salieri is a deeply flawed but fascinating character—a man consumed by jealousy, yet also in awe of Mozart’s genius. His sabotage of Mozart is tragic, not just because of what it does to Mozart, but because Salieri himself recognizes the beauty he is trying to destroy. There’s a complexity there: Salieri hates Mozart, but he also admires him. He wishes, more than anything, that he could be his friend, but he cannot overcome his own bitterness.

The extended edition, however, adds a crucial change: Salieri doesn’t just work against Mozart—he actively humiliates Mozart’s wife, Constanze. This transforms Salieri from a tormented, conflicted figure into something much simpler: a villain. Instead of a man waging a war against God through Mozart, he’s just a petty, lecherous schemer.

The real Antonio Salieri was not some scheming villain—he was a respected composer, teacher, and conductor who mentored some of the greatest musicians of the next generation, including Beethoven, Schubert, and Liszt.


The newly released 4K restoration is the original theatrical version:

https://www.amazon.com/Amadeus-4K-Ultra-Digital-UHD/dp/B0DQQ...


And while there was some discord between Salieri and Mozart in real life, it was more like friendly rivals rather than enemies -- they even collaborated on at least one piece https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/A-German-Composer-...


I'm not sure if this is the case for the screenplay, but for the actual play the playwright (who also wrote the screenplay) rewrote the ending at least 6 times over 20 years and multiple productions. The version of the play I read is similar to what you describe as the original theatrical cut.


If you sail to the Bay of Pirates you can find many wares from far distant shores. Mayhap you will find what you want there.


> Beethoven

The mythical rivalry should be with Beethoven, not Mozart!

True tidbits:

* Beethoven actually referred to Salieri as his "most active opponent" (Solomon's translation)

* Salieri criticized Beethoven's opera Fidelio (as did a lot of other composers of the time)

* Salieri didn't like Beethoven's late works. And apparently he critiqued them so hard that he even caused Schubert, another of his students, to not like Beethoven's music for a short time.

Armed just with that I could probably work slowly but surely over time to turn all of HN full Q-anon on a Salieri vs. Beethoven conspiracy. But I'll be good and vaccinate everyone here-- Beethoven also had a difficult relationship with his other famous teacher Joseph Haydn. He was quite a moody guy! And Salieri was a good sport-- he even sat in to play drums on Wellington's Victory. So in reality it's just good clean musical friends having some fun.


"Salieri didn't like Beethoven's late works."

I remember that the concert introducing the fifth and sixth symphonies was widely criticized. This was mid-life, not late.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beethoven_concert_of_22_Dece...

Edit: I don't find evidence in the wiki of hostile reception, excepting this:

"The concert provoked the ire of fellow composer Antonio Salieri, who had been Beethoven's teacher. Also on 22 December, Salieri organized his annual concert to benefit widows and orphans, and he threatened to ban any Tonkünstler-Societät musicians who had played in Beethoven's concert instead of his own. However, soon after the relationship between the two composers improved."


I would also pitch that against the mythical friendship that was Mozart and Haydn‘s


As a kid, I was really excited to try out binoculars, and "see for myself" the so-called "binocular shot." I was very disappointed.


Pretty much exactly how I write. (My lower case zeta is prettier)


I believe Wiles' proof requires the case of n=3 (Euler), and n=4 (Fermat) separately. That is, Wiles' proof starts with n=5 for nontrivial reasons.

So it is more likely that Fermat saw n=4, and thought the rest would be similar.



Could it be true for gravitational waves?


I'm not sure if the maths are related, but there is a different (though similar) idea in gravitational slingshots. It's not the same because it simply uses "normal" linear momentum. But I also only read the abstract, lol.


LaTeX.

I LaTeX, Git, and emacs every day.


Honestly TeX/LaTeX the engine is a marvel of technology,

But everytime i see a \makeatletter or get a runaway argument it reinforces my belief LaTeX the language was a mistake


(La)TeX is an example of a very enlightened _idea_ that offed itself \footnotemark{} with a spectacularly cursed user interface. It is simply gross to write, and it's difficult for frontends, converters and GUIs to make it much better.

Yes yes, I can already hear the cultists chant "YoU dOn'T wRiTe In LaTeX" but this mentality is precisely the problem. If I can't write directly in your typesetting system nowadays, then I'm sorry, your system probably sucks.

You could unfortunately write an article or thesis quite comfortably in Word or even InDesign, while formatting as you go. (I say "unfortunately" because from a business-model and hacker's perspective, these tools suck.)

\footnotetext{not implying that LaTeX is dead, but referring to how it sentenced itself to the academic niche, in which case it might as well be dead…}


From what I’ve seen from Latex GUI applications, there’s no way we can avoid complexity. Most users will do OK with a basic word processor. We do not need a silver bullet for every use case. You select the best one and move on.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: