Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | khimaros's commentslogin



that particular quant is just corrupted. these work but seem to loop in reasoning a lot https://huggingface.co/groxaxo/Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B-GGUF

unsloth version works.

unsloth, activate!

I'm using official @8bit quants from Qwen, they maintain more capability

i made this specifically for use with vscode/llama.cpp: https://github.com/khimaros/mortar

the Glider HN app for Android shows related posts with high overlap to dang's list, so it must be possible for mere mortals after all.


It was really just a rhetorical joke, but I wrote an app that is a system, based on a custom backend and native frontend.

I wrote a special native management app, and often use that, to implement dashboard functionality, like the kind of thing that the HN mods do.

Yeah, I could, for example, feed the logs into an LLM, and get fancy reports, but it’s a lot easier to simply hit the charts button in the navbar, and view interactive graphs, customized exactly for my workflow.


were you trying to reply to someone else?


No, I'm saying they are hyping up some random podcast while saying sweet nothings. I really don't like empty hype. I want some actual content to posts that actually says something, not just links breathlessly encouraging me to go spend an hour listening.


Not sure where you get the breathless bit from. If you don't want to listen, then don't. If you want me to summarize everything for you and give you the bullet points that is also something that will take more time than I am willing to commit at the moment. You can listen to it, or not. No skin off my back. The irony with some of the commentary is along the lines of "don't listen to influencers" and the like. I provided a link to (what I feel to be) a very worthwhile listen that is the antithesis of the grab-a-headline news of late. I have no connection to this particular podcast and have listened to a handful of episodes over the years on subjects that interest me. This particular subject (Huge IPOs, what is or isn't tracked, what float is, etc) turns out to be a relatively deep domain and there are inherent tradeoffs between different approaches. That's all.


And where did the ad hominem part arise?



It's all empty words.

> a very thorough and nuanced discussion

> bunch of smart investment / finance guys

> No click-bait-sky-is-falling content.

The middle one is the ad-hominem puffery. The rest isn't quite exactly 100% 'of the person's, but still doesn't give me any actual leads into what the content is: its just empty puffery.


> vacuous empty comments > saying sweet nothings > empty puffery

By definition the only ad-hominem comments to be seen anywhere above.


building something similar: https://github.com/khimaros/autiobook


thank you for this, and also for your search engine


this has not been my experience on desktop or Android. did you opt into something? are you accessing via browser search or Google.com?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: