Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | metabagel's commentslogin

Yes, equanimity is a great quality to possess. It means that you never get too high or too low. When things are really going your way, you know that things can change for the worse. Yet you can be content. When things are not going your way, you know that things can change for the better. And you can be content.

This doesn't mean that you don't try to achieve anything. It means that you can still be content whether you succeed or fail.

Thank you for reminding me about this word.


> some people in tech companies will identify people like me and wring us out in ways that only benefit them

Absolutely. They inevitably get promoted to managers, because they are able to parasitically get things done.


How does this relate to the SOLID project?

https://solidproject.org/


I'd say some of the worldview is shared but the architecture and ethos is very different. Some major differences:

- AT tries to solve aggregation of public data first. I.e. it has to be able to express modern social media. Bluesky is a proof that it would work in production. AFAIK, Solid doesn't try to solve aggregation, and is focused on private data first. (AT plans private data support but not now.)

- AT embraces "apps describe on their own formats" (Lexicons). Solid uses RDF which is a very different model. My impression is RDF may be more powerful but is a lot more abstract. Lexicon is more or less like *.d.ts for JSON.


Trump wants to acquire Greenland and rent it back to the Greenlanders.

They’re not occupying forces. There is a status of forces agreement between the two countries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_forces_agreement


You are right. But it's a matter of perspective. In the mainstream perspective those bases are based on contracts and a method of mutual security. But there is indeed also the perspective in Germany that those bases are factually occupying forces and given their history the option of having those bases removed have been limited.

And there is a kernel of truth in it. The USA likely wouldn't give up Ramstein under any circumstances safe the German military mobilizing against them, the base is (was?) too important for the US. When Trump invades Greenland we will see this play out (how the base stays active and Germany is powerless to stop that).


So the occupier and country occupied signed an legal agreement making the occupation officially legal?

De facto and de jure are two very, very different things...

(not saying the US forces are occupying Germany, just commenting on op's logic)


It’s not. It’s mocking.

I like my politicians to be professional.

Stronger unions would help bring wages up.

That is an interesting chicken and egg problem. A strong union requires members who can demonstrate that prolonged work stoppages are a credible threat. If the employer thinks everyone will be starving and begging to come back after a week, the union has no power.

In other words, in order for a union to become strong, wages already need to be up to allow the workers to be able amass considerable savings to get them through the months and years when they aren't working. So higher wages have to come first. But to complicate matters, once workers have that, they often start to feel like they don't need a union.

The one time when unions did become strong, workers were so desperate for safer working conditions that potentially being thrown out on the street and left to starve was seen as a better option than being crushed by a machine. But the law now ensures that workers are just comfortable enough to prevent an uprising like that again.


I think the lock picking lawyer's voice would drive me up the wall, not that I don't enjoy some of his content.

> https://meetinghouse.cc - My site for helping twitter users find each other

This would be nice for Bluesky. I deleted my account on Twitter after it turned into a hellscape.


I get the frustration, since so many submissions link to a page which assumes prior knowledge, and without adding any explanatory comment. In this case, you could find out by clicking on "Why Orion?" to the left or the "Orion" link in the upper right.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: