https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj41vn9q81ko

> free-roaming wolves are more important than people

I'm sure that nobody said that, ever, in the Netherlands.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/child-bit-coyote-whit...

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/orleans-park-closed-coyote-at...

It isn't. It falls slightly apart in the `s` column, and completely in the `t` column which contains both "chi" and "tsu". It also breaks for godan words that end in "u" which become "wa" in the negative form.

Mu, bu and nu also all obey the -nda transformation due to phonetics, and not due to how "if we just shuffle the letters around and presto! Nomu becomes nonda".

Japanese already has plenty of its own reading inconsistencies, so adding another layer on top isn't going to help you.

Finally, there's going to be so much kana in your every day life that learning conjugation in romaji is guaranteed to cripple your reading, because instead of recognizing kana (e.g. you see a billboard that says お茶を飲んだ方がいい！ as you frantically try to back-translate everything into romaji, but also removing excess w's and converting nda's as you go) you've spent the first n hours on trying to "hack" the language instead of just learning it.

All of this is described just below, in the section called “why romaji is actually bad”, with these specific examples being tested.

> It also breaks for godan words that end in "u" which become "wa" in the negative form.

This is also described further below in the post.

> as you frantically try to back-translate everything into romaji, but also removing excess w's and converting nda's as you go

I see “understanding the system” and “applying it fluently” as two separate activities. I find romaji more illustrative for the former because the system is phonetical on a sub-mora level. Whereas kana is more helpful for the latter. I don’t assume my reader is an idiot, and so I assume that they would be able to pick the right tool for the job on their learning journey. The fluency always layers on separately anyway, understanding doesn’t “help” there. It’s just that personally I find understanding a great motivator (and fallback) for developing fluency.

But really, it's more like tolerated business partner, right?

Even if you use another one, we need to break the myth that Google is the only option out there.

I'm also a Kagi user, but the index they mainly use is Google's. So I am paying for a good UI, a couple of nice features, and a frontend/proxy.

The only independent index I am aware of, is Mojeek.

Just for anyone else reading, I would say it is inaccurate to say it is a different front-end over Google. They pull from a range of search engines, but also run their own web crawlers and indices. It's the closest thing to a fully new search engine we've had so far.

  WITH lagged AS (
      SELECT 
          *, 
          LAG(event_time) OVER (PARTITION BY user_id ORDER BY event_time) AS prev_time
      FROM events
  ),
  sessions AS (
      SELECT 
          *, 
          SUM(COALESCE((date_diff('minute', prev_time, event_time) > 30)::INT, 1)) 
              OVER (PARTITION BY user_id ORDER BY event_time) AS session_id
      FROM lagged
  )
  SELECT
      user_id,
      session_id,
      MIN(event_time) AS session_start,
      MAX(event_time) AS session_end,
      COUNT(*) AS event_count
  FROM sessions
  GROUP BY ALL
  ORDER BY user_id, session_start;

  result = (
      df.sort(["user_id", "event_time"])
      .with_columns(
          session_id=(
              pl.when(pl.col("event_time").diff().is_null())
              .then(1)
              .when(pl.col("event_time").diff().dt.total_minutes() > 30)
              .then(1)
              .otherwise(0)
              .cum_sum()
              .over("user_id")
          )
      )
      .group_by(["user_id", "session_id"])
      .agg(
          session_start=pl.col("event_time").min(),
          session_end=pl.col("event_time").max(),
          event_count=pl.col("event_time").count(),
      )
      .sort(["user_id", "session_start"])
  )

Other dataframe libraries work directly on duckdb also, like Ibis.

FWIW, I think SQLAlchemy does also.

In any case though, I find both the SQL and the code there equally readable.

Imagine how people think about a "work truck" vs the 150k shiny lifted toy in the third garage. Same tool, totally different treatment from even the same person using the tool!

Will AI ever cross into the realm of "beloved and cherished tool" in the minds of the masses? I think when that happens, we have probably safely crossed into a realm where AI has some sort of inherent value to society and therefore commands that respect from society, inherent consciousness not even relevant perhaps. For some people, this might already be the case, but I do think it requires a buy-in from the majority of society and then the laws and norms will be codified into law long after we've largely decided that this is how we feel collectively about AI.

It's going to definitely be an interesting decade ahead.

> Will AI ever cross into the realm of "beloved and cherished tool" in the minds of the masses?

OpenClaw is the new rolling coal.

> The convention [...] recognises certain powers and immunities of the aircraft commander who on international flights may restrain any person(s) he has reasonable cause to believe is committing or is about to commit an offence liable to interfere with the safety of persons or property on board or who is jeopardising good order and discipline.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_Convention

Is there some reasonable test? Could he do this for a band t shirt

  > he has reasonable cause to believe is committing or is about to commit an offence

You're being unreasonable. Think about what you're saying. It's the equivalent of "You can't wear that shirt, someone might get offended and punch you in the face." We don't act like this in society. You arrest the person who throws the punch, not the person wearing the shirt. Just the same way you don't arrest a woman for wearing something slutty, you arrest the person who sexually assaulted them. This is the definition of victim blaming. It doesn't matter if the victim is increasing their odds of being victim (unless they are actively seeking out and attempting to become a victim).

Be reasonable. Punish the person who is actually committing the offense. Don't punish someone because of some imaginary offense.

Did you miss the part where the convention was ratified by 180+ countries, because clearly society can't just take a seat?