Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | skruban's commentslogin

Yup, I use Standard Notes for its privacy features. Got the 5 year plan some time ago, looks like they discontinued it.


https://www.skruban.com/

A simple site, just written in HTML/CSS last month :)


Test!!


Reminds me of Feynman's interaction with an Abacus Salesman in "Surely, You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!".

https://www.ee.ryerson.ca/~elf/abacus/feynman.html


As a Singaporean Indian (Tamil) I've always found caste identity talk in the US/India very intriguing. I've never heard caste mentioned here in SG; in fact I don't even know what caste I'm from. How would one identify your caste? Can't those from a lower caste just claim that they are brahmins?


> How would one identify your caste?

That can be generally done by checking what traditions one follows. For example, Brahmins are supposed to be involved with all priestly work and a strict Brahmin does not eat meat and wears Janeu[1].

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upanayana


As Dravidians your people have been on the receiving end of caste imposed by Aryans, so unless you were Brahmins they did not have the same incentives to preserve the system once they left the suffocating environment of India.


Also Tamil. Your cousin's brother in law's sister's mother in law will attest to your caste whatever that caste is.

They check for who you are related to and know knows you who belongs to X caste.


> only "alternatives" are Facebook and (barely usable) SMS.

Why don't Americans use Telegram?


For me there are two basic reasons: 1) everyone I know is on iMessage, 2) iMessage does everything I require of a messaging app. Honest question and not trying to be hostile, why should I prefer telegram? What am I missing?


1) everyone I know is on iMessage,

So you're privileged in an entirely privileged bubble? If iPhone is only 52% of the USA and 20% of the world it seems almost statistically impossible that all of your friends or family can use iMessage.


End to end encryption. If you’re using iCloud with iMessage Apple has access to your messages.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-fbi-icloud-exclusiv...


Apple doesn't have access to your iMessages unless you give them permission by consenting to have your keys backed up to iCloud. If you use iTunes backup (or don't back up your phone), the Messages will be encrypted and can only be unlocked if you have a device that still has the keys.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202303

"Messages in iCloud also uses end-to-end encryption. If you have iCloud Backup turned on, your backup includes a copy of the key protecting your Messages. This ensures you can recover your Messages if you lose access to iCloud Keychain and your trusted devices. When you turn off iCloud Backup, a new key is generated on your device to protect future messages and isn't stored by Apple."


“There’s always been one major problem with Apple’s privacy claim that ‘What happens on your iPhone, stays on your iPhone‘: it isn’t true of iCloud backups.

Although Apple uses end-to-end encryption for both iMessage and FaceTime, it doesn’t do the same for iCloud backups. They are encrypted, but Apple holds the key, meaning that the company has access to a copy of almost everything on your phone – and that includes stored messages.”

https://9to5mac.com/2020/01/21/icloud-backups/


I don't know what "gimmicks" it may have which iMessage does not(although the in-chat polls are pretty handy), but IMO the big strength of Telegram is privacy. You can use it without revealing your e-mail address or phone number.

The situation of not knowing a single non-Apple user is unlikely outside the US anyhow.


Why do I need to download another messaging app? iMessage works fine and WhatsApp for people outside the US.


why would a biased insight be better than no insight? Depends on the amount of biasness, doesn't it?


Because having multiple researches about the same subject but with different biases is the way to eliminate bias with meta analysis studies.


People aren’t against anti fascism as an ideology, they are against people using “anti fa” as a moniker to legitimize their violence.

It’s as daft as saying you’re against democracy because you dislike the democratic people’s Republic of Korea.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: