I installed it and loaded my init.vim. It is just so slow. I'm a pretty heavy user of snippets, and it honestly takes like 1 second for my snippets to appear after I call them.
Nvim desparetely needs a good GUI. Ever GUI I've tried (I think I've tried all of them) lags when calling snippets.
Unfortunately, AFAIK there is no way to check that if he hasn't tooted. Also, bear in mind it might not be him..might be a fake account, but then I'd suspect it would have been used more.
I never had the impression that Musk cared much about privacy but I seem to be wrong. Or perhaps it has more to do with the current POTUS and his impact in the environment. Either way, I am happy for his decision.
Matterlist seems interesting. My problem with these kind of services always comes to two things:
- Pricing;
- Privacy;
I find it incredibly expensive to spend 5usd (and 10 on some) for essentially a to-do-list software. And you might tell me that it's the price of a coffee, but it really is not. A coffee, where I am from, is much cheaper, but more importantly, everything is subscription based nowadays. How come it is so expensive?
- Privacy: Is that E2EE? I suppose not. Does anyone know of such a project that has E2EE and is not from the US? (edit: apparently, matterlist is from estonia. Good)
Also, you state "Try our native apps now! It's free!". I would, but apparently it's "coming soon". There are no accounts and there is nothing to download yet. Is it even possible to use it right now?
Not yet. However, this is something I'd absolutely like to see implemented, including for my own personal use. Alternatively, we could use optional LastPass-style encryption based on a master password for task texts, which should be easier to implement (though it will restrict search by task text to client-only).
> How come it is so expensive?
We'll need to be self-sustained for the long term. The app is 100% bootstrapped and there will be no external funding. Plus, a to-do app just cannot afford to be unsustainable, because its closure will hurt a lot of its users. So we'd prefer to scare off some part of our potential user base, but in exchange gain better financial stability and thus longevity.
Also, it may be just me, but the app, as it currently is, with all its rough corners, provides much more value (at least by a couple of orders of magnitude) to me than it's planned monthly cost.
> Also, you state "Try our native apps now! It's free!". I would, but apparently it's "coming soon"
Sorry for that. We haven't publicly announced the app yet, but the site is written and designed as if the app is already available for download, hehce the mismatch.
Can you share the source for "that has top (A class in EU) filtration" please? I might be buying a new vacuum soon and would like to research it well before doing so.
No, but if you visit your Threads page (link at the top of every page) you can see any replies to any of your comments. There's nothing special that marks a new reply, though.
I have a habit of upvoting nearly every reply anyone makes to any comment of mine, as a way of thanking them for the comment. This also happens to help when I skim my Threads page, since it's easy to spot comments that still have the voting button(s).
That's wrong. You no longer need a third password in protonmail. All you need to have, in order to login, is the username and a password. If you've 2FA enabled, you need the 2FA code of-course.
I think you mean second password rather than third, but as a user of ProtonMail, I need one username, two passwords and one 2FA token to get in, with only login username/password being kept in a password manager (and all password managers get confused by multiple passwords, so I couldn't keep them all even if I changed my mind and wanted to).
ProtonMail may have the option (I am not aware of this) to have login password and mailbox password set the same (and not prompt you twice if this is the case), but they are still separate passwords. You, as user, control whether you want them to be the same or not. If you chose this, the application then has an option for convenience to use the same input for both tasks. This is opposed to a service where they are always the same, so that the password send to the backend is the same used to decrypt your data.
Nvim desparetely needs a good GUI. Ever GUI I've tried (I think I've tried all of them) lags when calling snippets.