The example is indeed two years old. I also couldn't find any point in the article that explains why this is worth doing.

But it's a valid example, isn't it?

Someone just wanted to share their Rust + JavaScript knowledge with people, and they got a cease and desist. It's clearly not ideal.

Given they did not change the name, it suggests the legal challenge had failed. So why do we care?

Legal risk alone discourages people. But also, I don't really care.

Totally. Most people just click Accept All on the dumb cookie banners, and they don't give a sh*t about privacy at all.

Its not that they dont care at all. They just dont care until they feel the pain of it, because they are optimising for short term satisfaction.

I take to heart how my stomach reacts whenever I have to jump on a quick call. But you have to do it anyway, and the feeling of having survived those calls is, no doubt, rewarding.

I find it becomes less rewarding over time. Easy to resent the wastefulness of it.

"Living at high altitude reduces risk of dying from heart disease", but you're litereally locked in your house because the sun takes every chance to fry you. I'm okay with not reducing my risk of dying from heart disease.

So easy to protect from the sun and the reward in the mountains is so wonderful. Terrible waste to stay locked in.

Wouldn’t be surprised if this were another contributor to less heart disease- so much incentive to get outside and do stuff.

No, you just wear long sleeve shirts and a hat.

You had a brilliant idea! This is the most satisfying AI app I've used in a while lol.

I feel the same. We’re still in the very early days of AI agents. Honestly, just orchestrating CC subagents alone could already be a killer product.

I've been thinking about this a lot lately!

"All wooden boats always leak a little, so stopping people from drilling holes through the hull is a wild target."

It's a strawman to pretend that 10,000 year slow changes are qualitatively the same as what's been going on in the last hundred.

I’d like to apologize. Realized that the wording in my comment wasn’t appropriate.

Maybe the soul is not as mysterios as we think it is?

There is no empirical test for souls.

So MCP won. This integration unlock a lot of possibilities. It's not dangerous because ppl "turn this on without understanding" - it's ppl who are that careless are dangerous.