Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I assume you get downvoted because theoretical CS research really doesn't need to involve coding, so it's not as odd as you seem to think.


Dijkstra famously compared this to astronomers who have no interest in telescopes or observing. I love theory, would happily retire to it—but I can’t see how anyone could have the right imagination calibration without lots of practice.


Dijkstra famously compared this to astronomers who have no interest in telescopes or observing

That certainly isn't my interpretation of the quote (unless you're thinking of a different quote than the one I'm familiar with)

The quote I know is: "Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes."


yep, the fact that computer sciences spend a lot of time on pen/paper/board and brings proofs without actually program them doesn't mean that CS researchers are not interested in code. Code is their ultimate goal, but it's an implementation detail :-)


No offence, but you sound like you haven't worked in or close to such a field. CS theory very often doesn't require coding at all, and coding would be barely helpful.

edit: this is not a value statement.


You have definitely gotten Dijkstra's intent with that famous quote completely backwards…




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: