Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I'd like to think that's not true, but it wouldn't be the first time such a technique has been used, apparently successfully.

It's also why Twitter wants to 'curate' your timeline, instead of simply displaying tweets from people you follow in temporal order.



Twitter have recently re-introduced a chronological timeline as an option.


Does it work like it did in the past?

I've given up every platform that forwent the chronological timeline because other feed algorithms are just frustrating, and Twitter is the only one I miss.


I never realized Twitter curated timeslines because I don't follow enough people for it to cut anything out. It is effectively a chronological order of posts by people I follow.


My big problem with Twitter's timeline is showing me things that people I follow have liked. In every case, those posts are political and divisive, i.e., the "red meat" of social media. They're just throwing those into my feed to get a reaction from me, hoping that I'll "engage" with whatever stupid topic comes up, as though Twitter were a good place for having a discussion about anything.

I've turned off the "show best tweets first" option, and I stick with using Tweetbot. But, like most people seem to indicate here, about Facebook (which I don't use at all), my continued use hangs by a thread. It wouldn't take much for me to cancel my account. Again.


I follow around 500, have around 1500 followers.

As far as I can tell, Twitter doesn't hide anything from, instead showing me tweets from people I don't follow.


I believe this is why recently Twitter reverted the change and now allows you to browse in chronological order.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: