>>A Creationist can not perform what he thinks is correct science without performing what the rest of the world is incorrect science.
>(That's not a disprovable belief, of course, so it could be the case.)
Do you see the inconsistency here. You're saying on the one hand "it's bad science" and other the other admitting that their isn't any scientific reason to declare the position as false. A "running start" theory appears to be unfalsifiable and thus outside of the realms of scientific result.
>(That's not a disprovable belief, of course, so it could be the case.)
Do you see the inconsistency here. You're saying on the one hand "it's bad science" and other the other admitting that their isn't any scientific reason to declare the position as false. A "running start" theory appears to be unfalsifiable and thus outside of the realms of scientific result.