This is definitely the sort of idea that I like when exploring and trying to find a better model. The point I was trying to make in the article is that there are times when, however you try, you don't find a satisfying answer in the time you have.
Your point was good. But perhaps your unfortunate example is in turn a good example that if you can't find a good name for something perhaps there is a different way to look at things that produces a less contrived (but still explicit and honest) naming scheme.
Looking forward to read about your explorations on that front.
