Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

People like who like think like this like way like really like grind like my like gears. Like I like especially like enjoy like that, like, there's like no like explanation like for like why like this like would like be like a like problem.

You really see nothing wrong with this?



Except that this sounds like a Xerox of a Xerox of a stereotyped California valley girl. Reductio ad absurdum much?

Also it's significantly less noticeable in spoken conversation. smh...


For people in the age group that commonly does this, they know which part of the sentence the interjection is likely to appear in, and their brain can automatically filter it out, so it doesn't bother them and they don't even see it as a problem.

This applies to all verbal interjection. You use some form of verbal interjection too, but of course you don't even notice that you are doing it, and you would also get angry if some other people told you that your speech pattern is stupid and that you should change how you naturally speak.


Old man yells at cloud. “Back in my day likes were called ums and ahs!”


And we teach people to avoid those too.

Weasel words and delaying terms are common regardless, and usually not desirable.


If you think you're going to get rid of filler, you're in for a big disappointment:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filler_(linguistics)

> In linguistics, a filler, filled pause, hesitation marker or planner is a sound or word that participants in a conversation use to signal that they are pausing to think but are not finished speaking.

[snip]

> Every conversation involves turn-taking, which means that whenever someone wants to speak and hears a pause, they do so. Pauses are commonly used to indicate that someone's turn has ended, which can create confusion when someone has not finished a thought but has paused to form a thought; in order to prevent this confusion, they will use a filler word such as um, er, or uh.[1][3] The use of a filler word indicates that the other person should continue listening instead of speaking.[4]

More to the point: Every language has them. Every language has always had them. Journalists are trained to edit them out of "verbatim" conversational speech unless they want the person they're quoting to come off like an imbecile, but longstanding journalistic convention doesn't mean filler is in any way recent.

We don't always speak without filler any more than we always speak in iambic pentameter.


They may not be desirable but they are probably useful.

Many years ago I saw a study that ums and ahs helped listeners understand better because it indicated the next phrase was important.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: