Suppose I have a fantastic idea for a company: I start importing BAIC Beijing BJ90s to Germany, then I glue a new star-in-a-circle badge onto them and sell them.
Mercedes-Benz decides that I shouldn't do this, and gets a court injunction to stop me. Volkswagen thinks my company is hilarious, and decides to continue importing cars on my behalf. They don't actually do the badge-gluing -- I have to do that in a third location -- but they are more than willing to perform the actual import.
Should the court prevent VW from participating in the scheme? If they should, why is that different from the Cloudflare case?
I would like the rule of law to applies to all industries equally. I am mostly unconvinced by the special pleading of the technology industry. I am willing to be convinced, however!
Mercedes-Benz decides that I shouldn't do this, and gets a court injunction to stop me. Volkswagen thinks my company is hilarious, and decides to continue importing cars on my behalf. They don't actually do the badge-gluing -- I have to do that in a third location -- but they are more than willing to perform the actual import.
Should the court prevent VW from participating in the scheme? If they should, why is that different from the Cloudflare case?