Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah, they keep doing this. Came to say this (I don't quite care about / for the product itself).

They introduced Google Meet when Jitsi Meet already existed and is a similar product! It was easy to call it Google Call, or I don't know, figure it out. You haven't ran out of synonyms for Talk yet despite the huge churn. There are certainly sexier possible names than "Meet" too. Or than Gemini.

Come on, you can find names that don't clash with existing products. You have dedicated teams for this. You've heard about the existing stuff. I'm sure you do extensive research when picking a name, to avoid lawsuits if nothing else. Also Someone has heard of Gemini at Google. Someone has heard of Jitsi Meet at Google. It has to be intentional.

Of course Gemini comes from Greek mythology, nobody can claim the exclusivity on this, and here it's not even a competitor. Meet is a generic term too.

They chose the name clashes. It's highly likely they can't be sued for this. But still. Legal ≠ right. Find something else.

Rant over.



You are right that Google can't be sued for this. The only thing that the Gemini protocol/Gemini clients/Gemini community could do is rebrand.


Or wait for Google's "Update on" Gemini. Unclear which of the two options is more efficient :P.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: