Why not both? They solve different problems, after all.

I'm currently using `litestream` for backups but I might add `sqlite3_rsync` as a point-in-time replica for things that benefit from "remote" sqlite access - easier than restoring a version from `litestream`, safer than copying it myself, and a lot easier than transporting changes over NATS / HTTP / whatnot.

Looks like Litestream streams changes but sqlite3_rsync only updates a snapshot at the time it was called.