> “show me the connection” is a request for evidence.
Evidence... yes, that narrowed it down a lot. You're looking for evidence! In a debate! I never could have guessed! Luckily for you, @TMWNN did, and tried to help twice, but clearly they didn't know you were looking for evidence, not whatever they provided.
In case it wasn't clear, I'm being sarcastic. You asked for evidence of a connection, they gave you it twice, and yet it clearly wasn't the evidence you actually wanted because you wouldn't just tell them what you actually wanted!
Also, btw, I never said this guy was prominent. I meant what I said, not something slightly different to further a not-so-hidden agenda.
[EDIT: forget it, already spent far too much time on this thread today, not falling victim to sunk cost fallacy! Any more than I already have, that is…]
Evidence... yes, that narrowed it down a lot. You're looking for evidence! In a debate! I never could have guessed! Luckily for you, @TMWNN did, and tried to help twice, but clearly they didn't know you were looking for evidence, not whatever they provided.
In case it wasn't clear, I'm being sarcastic. You asked for evidence of a connection, they gave you it twice, and yet it clearly wasn't the evidence you actually wanted because you wouldn't just tell them what you actually wanted!
Also, btw, I never said this guy was prominent. I meant what I said, not something slightly different to further a not-so-hidden agenda.