Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Fwiw, this is a facile argument. You make no attenpt to demonstrate that after major reorganization (breakup / nationalization) that the firm will continue to have the desirable attributes (innovation, efficincy, ability to build) that made them too important to fail.


Why should I have to pay for their failure but not be rewarded when they profit.

Essentially as a taxpayer I'm being forced to take all the downside risk without any gain.

Nobody in the universe would make that trade.


You didn't respond to anything I said. If you want to shout into the void, notepad.exe is right there.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: