>immigration props up vast sectors of our economy (construction, delivery, and healthcare being the main ones).
Ignoring healthcare because it's not a "sector of the economy", look at what that "propping up" looks like: the rich get richer off their slave labour, whilst the poor get undercut and left out; natives can no longer make a living off sectors that were perfectly fine before. And, once again, it's the richest that benefit. This is a losing argument.
>our most tough-on-crime, tough-on-immigration president
Like all other conservatives in Europe, he is very tough on everything, and then does absolutely nothing against it. I bet he imported as much slave labour as the most leftist president of France, if not more.
> whilst the poor get undercut and left out; natives can no longer make a living off sectors that were perfectly fine before
Might sound harsh, but so what? You can’t make a living connecting telephone calls either, used to be a perfectly fine job.
If you can’t make a living doing job x, the demand isn’t there and the supply will automatically reduce. If there is more demand than supply, wages will inevitably increase at some point.
This feels a lot like taxi drivers complaining that they can’t make a living in an era of deregulation. And again, so what? A couple of taxi drivers previously subsidised by the government through artificial supply constraints lose while the rest of society wins.
Ignoring healthcare because it's not a "sector of the economy", look at what that "propping up" looks like: the rich get richer off their slave labour, whilst the poor get undercut and left out; natives can no longer make a living off sectors that were perfectly fine before. And, once again, it's the richest that benefit. This is a losing argument.
>our most tough-on-crime, tough-on-immigration president
Like all other conservatives in Europe, he is very tough on everything, and then does absolutely nothing against it. I bet he imported as much slave labour as the most leftist president of France, if not more.