Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I don't want my X posts being handed over to researchers even if they are technically public.

Too bad, don't make them public then. I'm not sure where this idea came from that "free speech" also means "free of consequences", but it sure is pervasive. It's always been the case in every society for all time that you need to be careful what you say publicly. The modern notion of "free speech" is related to retaliation from the government, it doesn't grant you immunity from people reacting to your public speech, nor does it grant you some sort of ill-defined "public speech anonymity."





It’s only recently that free speech could result in government-backed NGOs and government-cozy media collaborating to have a private citizen nationally tarred and feathered, fired from their job, and issued death threats within hours of what they thought was a semi-private conversation. This is absolutely a new state of affairs.

In the past, news would travel—but slowly—and minor news about local citizens was not normally considered newsworthy in non-local markets unless it was extremely unusual and entertaining.


You mean how it happened with Charlie Kirk and all the posts about him, that led to people being tarred and feathered and losing their jobs?

Yes, exactly like that. Also random nobodies making crude jokes online, professors taking unpopular stances or refusing to adjust course materials for political reasons, individuals who argue with protesters, protesters who burn flags, Bibles, or Qurans, and citizens who simply express support for their preferred candidates.

You thought this was some kind of “gotcha” because you pegged me as a right winger opposing cancel culture. I support free speech, period.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: