I am at least objective in my criticism. I'm not going to reply to 5 different emotionally charged strawman arguments, especially because I don't care to defend Meta.
If you're going to engage in discussion, at least try to interpret the other parties argument charitably. You're wasting both our time replying to the dumbest interpretation of what I said.
You gave one sentence statement to try to explain why you think the company does anything that would count as "extremely beneficial" (your words), and it's just a list of stuff you didn't bother to elaborate on (including, laughably, Facebook Messenger, as if anyone could possibly count that as "extremely beneficial"). You didn't even make a cogent argument.
If you're going to engage in discussion, at least try to interpret the other parties argument charitably. You're wasting both our time replying to the dumbest interpretation of what I said.