Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Distillation is not a thing unless you actually have the model weights. What people misleadingly call distillation is just training on chat logs, which has always been routine practice in the industry. There's a reason why every model today talks like early releases of ChatGPT.


You can logit distill (full token probabilities) or one hot distill (chat logs), or even align hidden states. All are distillation methods.


If most people call it that, including the big labs, then maybe…you’re just out of date?


If Anthropic is calling it distillation [1] then that would argue for it being correct (or at least canonical) terminology.

[1] https://www.anthropic.com/news/detecting-and-preventing-dist...


No, a company choosing to use some terminology doesn’t make it correct nor canonical in any sense; especially when they have a vested interest in not being neutral or credible.

If Google starts calling ads “Best Links” that doesn’t make it correct nor canonical; the correct term is still ads.

Traditionally, distillation is when you get the actual logits of a model response (not exposed via API for years) and then use that to train a model.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: